“The First Thing You Do”: On Engaging With Difference
I’m not a big poetry person. Well, not anymore. I am reluctant to admit that my life and my daily focus have shifted sufficiently that I have a difficult time appreciating poetry in the way that I did in my late teens and early twenties. I don’t notice things like I used to back then; for example, this time of year I tend to be utterly unaware of the changing foliage until well past the color’s peak - in a few weeks I’ll be driving and I’ll suddenly realize all the leaves have changed at once, and I’ll be baffled that I didn’t see it happening before now. I am too distracted, it seems.
The point being that I am not one who is easily moved by poetry, with its high regard for small details and nuance. But back when I was a grad student, taking one of my first courses on race, we read a poem by Pat Parker entitled “For The White Person Who Wants to Know How to Be My Friend“, and the first two lines go like this:
The first thing you do is to forget that i’m Black.
Second, you must never forget that i’m Black.
Those words, for whatever reason, have stuck like a burr in my brain for many years subsequent, and have probably done me more good than the multitude of graduate-level coursework and academic readings I did on the subject both before and after hearing them. They make a seemingly impossible suggestion: that white folks must be aware of the fact that the experiences and cultures of people of color are different, but they must not fixate on those differences to the extent that the behavior becomes tokenizing, or discomforting, or - possibly worst of all - self-aggrandizing.
Those words have stuck with me also because they are so viscerally true of so many oppressed groups. I say this knowing I’m at risk of sounding like I am conflating racism with other forms of oppression - but that is not what I am proposing here. I am saying that this requirement of both remembering and forgetting is one that works in many situations, for those of us interested in showing respect and support to people whose positions or experiences we may not personally share. I am saying that when I am interacting people with identities that are not culturally normative, or culturally acceptable, and identities that I can’t claim, I can remember these lines as a guide.
If, for example, I am engaging with a friend who is disabled, when I am not myself disabled, and I feel all adrift as to how I should address situations that may be potentially problematic for a person with a disability, I will think to myself, as if my friend is speaking to me: “The first thing you do is to forget that I’m disabled. Second, you must never forget that I’m disabled.” It doesn’t provide an answer, no. But it gives me a framework, or at least a touchstone, from which I can begin; some firm ground on which I can stand while still leaving fair room for said friend to do her thing as she needs or prefers to do it. It reminds me to listen at least as much as I talk. Pat Parker’s poem really touches on the work of being friends with someone whose experience or abilities are unfamiliar, while at the same time noting that the work shouldn’t be made harder than it needs to be.
This poem also speaks indirectly to the concept of “colorblindness” - the idea common amongst many white folks that by claiming not to “see” race, they are therefore absolved from benefiting from or participating in institutionalized racism, no matter how conscious or unwitting that benefit and participation may be. Of course, the reality is that anyone who is physically capable of seeing race does see race. You can’t turn off culture inside your head just because there’s a person of color in front of you. What the idea of “colorblindness” is really meant to represent is that folks who claim “colorblindness” are claiming to be able to interact with a person of color without any preconceived notions, stereotypes, presumptions, expectations, or suspicions about said person based on their race, even the most persistent, involuntary, or unwelcome preconceived notions, etc., that those of us with aspirations toward living anti-racist lives still fight in our own heads on an almost-daily basis. Basically, “colorblindness” makes the case that it is possible for some folks to exist outside of the dominant, relentless, brain-hammering culture in which the rest of us live - the culture that both subtly and overtly reinforces racist stereotypes in everything from soft drink ads to textbooks. Colorblind folks have found a way out! They don’t cotton to that trash anymore. Somehow, the culture on which our whole damn world is built doesn’t affect them.
How in sweet fuck is that even possible? Short of being raised by wolves, or born with a brain wrapped in permanent tinfoil hat, how is it possible for anyone to escape culture? It’s not, unfortunately, something that can be done through sheer force of will. If it were, wouldn’t those of us who write and speak out as fat activists be totally free of the lingering effects of cultural fat hatred? Wouldn’t we not even need to watch our Sanity Points when entering the fray, because man, that stuff doesn’t even enter our consciousness. We’re above it; we’re outside it. We’re Teflon to fatphobic remarks; nothing gets to us, nothing sticks.
Inside my head, I’ve often changed the lines of Pat Parker’s poem yet again, to reflect one of my own positions: “The first thing you do is to forget that I’m fat. Second, you must never forget that I’m fat.” In other words: don’t assume I can’t climb the stairs; ask if you’re concerned. Think before asking for a booth or a table at a restaurant. Don’t try to protect me from your fatphobia by saying “Oh, but I wasn’t talking about you,” or “But you’re not [that] fat,” - I’m going to figure it out. Realize that my being fat is an important thing that affects my life in lots of ways, but it’s not the most important thing, nor is it the only thing I want to talk about.
And so on.
I don’t want people to be “fatblind”, because my fatness affects me and needs to be considered. I don’t want people not to see my fatness (or to pretend not to see my fatness), but I don’t want them to see only my fatness either. This expectation is paradoxical and insufferable and difficult but it’s also extraordinarily true. And when I’m trying to negotiate the tricky waters of intersectional politics, I use this feeling, this constant striving toward balance, to try to be both respectful and supportive of those with identities and experiences different from my own, even when I can’t directly relate to them. By doing so I’m both modeling the respect with which I’d like to be treated, as well as simply doing the right thing by being Not An Asshole to people who are different from me, as much as possible, even knowing that sometimes I am going to be an asshole no matter what. The real work of negotiating difference - both mine and yours - is half in an eagerness to do the right thing, and half in a willingness to look like an idiot by doing something wrong, but learning for the experience. As Parker sums it up:
In other words-if you really want to be my friend-don’t
make a labor of it. I’m lazy. Remember.





Wonderful post, Lesley. I think about these exact things too, but couldn’t have said them as well as you.
The same Pat Parker poem has remained high in my mind for the twenty years since I first read it. I’m grateful that it looks over my shoulder as I work to recognize and challenge my own white privilege and middle class privilege, and it keeps me company as I try to identify what I desire from able-bodied and non-fat allies (I am disabled and fat, though they’re not connected).
Ever since I read this, I’ve been thinking about my response to it for a couple of days. Actually, I’ve been contemplating this entire issue for months, ever since Tara’s “Fat Rant” post here in March.
Here goes. As someone who used to think of herself as “colorblind” until recently, here’s one thing to bear in mind: Probably most white people who say this are actually indulging in Olympic-level wishful thinking. They *want* this to be true, with every cell in their bodies. Because they believe that any form of racism or kickback thereof - overt, covert, conscious, unconscious, doesn’t matter - is bad. Very very bad. Child-molester bad.
And a lot of white people (especially white women) (especially FAT white women, and that’s most white women, right?) have self-esteem somewhere below toilet level, whether they admit it (as aspie blabbermouths like me will) or, more commonly, don’t even consciously acknowledge it and cover it up with a metric pantload of bravado, bluster, and bullying. If you tell them they have unconscious prejudice, or that they benefit from white privilege, what they’ll hear is analogous to something like this: “Well, gee, you know, I’m not saying you’re a *child molester* or anything, but what you said to that kid just now will probably scar him for life and there’s no way to take it back. He’ll probably kill himself over it. But you obviously can’t help yourself so, you know, carry on.” They internalize it as, “Oh fuck, one MORE thing that’s wrong with me. One MORE reason I am a crappy human being. One MORE reason I’ll never be good enough.”
I still feel that way a lot, and I’m fighting it tooth and nail. I know it’s no way to live, it’s no way to think, it’s no way to be, and that it benefits absolutely no one. But telling myself I shouldn’t feel that way doesn’t make me not feel that way. So I can only imagine what it’s like to try to change the internal reactions of someone who doesn’t *want* to change them, when changing them when I *do* want to is like pulling kidneys. Changing how people act externally and speak is WAY easier than changing how they think, in most cases.
Many a/A’s (people on the spectrum) have the same problem I have, which is the innate inability to differentiate small mistakes from large ones, differentiate someone being upset or angry with me from somebody hating me and wishing I were dead, and differentiate “you did/said something bad” from “you ARE bad.” (It didn’t help that I got ZERO help with any of this in childhood because the AS diagnosis didn’t exist then.) I have to check my responses constantly and make sure I’m really reacting to what’s happening in front of me instead of to the GARBAGE my brain generates as a knee-jerk response to conflict. Makes it hard to be an awesome ally, when I can barely advocate for myself. Who knows, though, maybe this kind of reactivity is a lot more common than just in a/A’s.